<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Thought Chasm &#187; das weisse band</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thoughtchasm.com/thoughts/das-weisse-band/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thoughtchasm.com</link>
	<description>a random selection of events, observations, ideas or happenings</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 14:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>belated post-Oscar rehash</title>
		<link>http://thoughtchasm.com/2010/03/belated-post-oscar-rehash/</link>
		<comments>http://thoughtchasm.com/2010/03/belated-post-oscar-rehash/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 16:00:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>draynd</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wtf??]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[82nd academy awards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[das weisse band]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lady pulled a kanye]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[precious]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thoughtchasm.com/?p=2190</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s taken me a minute to look over my predictions and weigh them against the winners. Please don&#8217;t read that as my taking any time on this. I&#8217;ve just been busy with more important things (depending on how you look at it). As always, I&#8217;m right and the Academy is sometimes wrong. I don&#8217;t fault [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s taken me a minute to look over my predictions and weigh them against the winners. Please don&#8217;t read that as my taking any time on this. I&#8217;ve just been busy with more important things (depending on how you look at it).</p>
<p>As always, I&#8217;m right and the Academy is sometimes wrong. I don&#8217;t fault them and either should you. Here&#8217;s a rapid rundown of where they misstepped:</p>
<p>While I only saw the one movie in both the Documentary and Foreign Language categories, both my picks should have won. This because dolphins are in far too much of the food we eat but <em>Food Inc.</em> is about all the rest and <em>Das Weisse Band</em> was black and white (end of story).</p>
<p><em>The Hurt Locker</em> was great. That it won the editing award means my prediction is less than right. Slightly. I&#8217;m man enough to admit that. (Note, this is completely false.)</p>
<p>Cinematography, defined: The art or technique of movie photography, including both the shooting and development of the film. Black and white photography is better than color photography, fact. Thus, <em>Das Weisse Band</em> should have won. (Fact.)</p>
<p>With the subject matter thrown into &#8220;Push,&#8221; how could you not make a compelling film? The acting (especially the protagonist) and directing held <em>Precious</em> (Based on the Novel &#8220;Push&#8221; by Sapphire) together, not the screenplay.</p>
<p>Tarantino was robbed of his Original Screenplay statue. The glaring inaccuracies and artistic licenses that make <em>Hurt Locker</em> a great film (and it is great) shouldn&#8217;t win a writing prize. Directing, obviously; acting, sure; and even cinematography, fine but not the writing.</p>
<p>The Academy came around and was right in all the other categories, including a possible (2% chance) game changer with <em>Hurt Locker</em> taking the big win. Overall the show was watchable but it was absurdly slow in parts and <a href="http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/2010/03/07/music_by_prudence_burkett/index.html" target="_blank">what was the deal with the lady Kanye</a>?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thoughtchasm.com/2010/03/belated-post-oscar-rehash/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2010 Oscar Predictions</title>
		<link>http://thoughtchasm.com/2010/02/2010-oscar-predictions/</link>
		<comments>http://thoughtchasm.com/2010/02/2010-oscar-predictions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 17:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>draynd</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[chasm reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wtf??]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[avatar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coraline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[das weisse band]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inglorious basterds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oscar predictions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the hurt locker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[up in the air]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thoughtchasm.com/?p=2155</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Do you hear the trumpets? If you were reading this on an i[Tab] you&#8217;d hear trumpets&#8230; So the nominations are in and, like &#8217;07, &#8217;08 and &#8217;09, I&#8217;m here to throw in my four cents. As always, I&#8217;ve listed my favorite and the likely winner. These are usually different because I don&#8217;t have any vested [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://z.about.com/d/sbinformation/1/0/G/1/oscarstatue.jpg"><img class="alignright" title="Oscar Statue" src="http://z.about.com/d/sbinformation/1/0/G/1/oscarstatue.jpg" alt="" width="146" height="214" /></a>Do you hear the trumpets? If you were reading this on an i[Tab] you&#8217;d hear trumpets&#8230;</p>
<p>So the nominations are in and, like <a href="/2007/02/oscar-predictions/">&#8217;07</a>, <a href="/2008/02/predictions-08-2/">&#8217;08</a> and <a href="http://thoughtchasm.com/2009/02/oscar-predictions-09/">&#8217;09</a>, I&#8217;m here to throw in my four cents. As always, I&#8217;ve listed my favorite and the likely winner. These are usually different because I don&#8217;t have any vested interest in terrible movies making money from year to year, like some people who will remain nameless (because I don&#8217;t know their names).</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve even thrown in some underdogs to <a href="/2010/02/the-old-man-in-me/">justify my drinking</a> during the show on March 7th. You can see <a href="http://www.imdb.com/features/rto/2010/oscars" target="_blank">all the nominees listed at IMDB</a>.</p>
<p><strong>Best Animated Feature:<br />
</strong> My pick: <em><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0327597/" target="_blank">Coraline</a></em><br />
Winner: <em><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1049413/" target="_blank">Up</a></em></p>
<p>I liked <em>Coraline</em> because the story and animation were more intriguing (scary as all hell, awesome). That won&#8217;t matter.</p>
<p><strong>Best Achievement in Visual Effects:<br />
</strong> My pick: <em><a href="/2010/01/avatar/">Avatar</a></em><br />
Winner: <em>Avatar</em></p>
<p>Every single one of these smaller, technical awards that <em>Avatar</em> is up for will bring home a statue for them. It&#8217;s a technical marvel. If only they would stop there&#8230;</p>
<p><strong>Best Documentary Feature:<br />
</strong> My pick: <em><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1286537/" target="_blank">Food, Inc.</a></em><br />
Winner: <em>Food, Inc.</em></p>
<p>With the caveat that it&#8217;s the only one I&#8217;ve seen, it&#8217;s also the only one that made money. This is a big deal for an industry trying to look deep with no interest in being deep. It&#8217;s a great film in its own right but making a little scratch never hurts your chances in this category.</p>
<p><strong>Best Foreign Language Film:<br />
</strong> My pick: <em><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1149362/" target="_blank">Das weisse Band</a></em><br />
Winner: <em>Das weisse Band</em><br />
Underdog: <em><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1235166/" target="_blank">Un prophète</a></em></p>
<p>Again, this is the only one I&#8217;ve seen in this category but with all the buzz, it&#8217;ll take the statue. And it should (despite many misunderstanding it as a commentary on the social climate that bore Nazism). But maybe the voters will misunderstand <em>Un prophète</em> as &#8220;profit&#8221; and throw their votes that way.</p>
<p><strong>Best Achievement in Editing:<br />
</strong> My pick: <em>Avatar</em><br />
Winner: <em>Avatar</em></p>
<p>Because&#8230; uh&#8230; it&#8217;s <em>Avatar</em>?</p>
<p><strong>Best Achievement in Cinematography:<br />
</strong> My pick: <em>Das weisse Band</em><br />
Winner: <em>Avatar</em><br />
Underdog: <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0361748/" target="_blank"><em>Inglourious Basterds</em></a><em></em></p>
<p>Guys, black and white is <em>soo</em> classy, right? (It&#8217;s like when there were movies before iPods or the eighties.) That and I don&#8217;t want <em>Avatar</em> to take all these damn statues. It&#8217;s blatent theft.</p>
<p><strong>Best Screenplay based on Previous Material:<br />
</strong> My pick: <em><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1193138/" target="_blank">Up in the Air</a></em><br />
Winner: <em>Up in the Air</em></p>
<p>Sorry, all, but this one&#8217;s too easy. <em><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1136608/" target="_blank">District 9</a></em> is great if you&#8217;re into sci-fi but most aren&#8217;t (which is a fact fans of sci-fi love to forget). <em>Up in the Air</em> is adorable to the point the <em>word</em> is sort of obnoxious and it still worth watching. That&#8217;s nearly impossible and deserves some kudos.</p>
<p><strong>Best Original Screenplay:<br />
</strong> My pick: <em>Inglourious Basterds</em><br />
Winner: <em><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0887912/" target="_blank">The Hurt Locker</a></em><br />
Underdog: <em>Up</em></p>
<p><em>Inglorious Basterds</em> has no chance at any others, unfortunately. This fact alone should get Tarantino the win but it doesn&#8217;t matter because, if the Academy decides to go with <em>Avatar</em> as the Big Winner, <em>Hurt Locker</em> may get the sympathy win here. Also, I liked <em>Up</em>. What of it? (That opening sequence was understated, powerful and made my tiny heart sob.)</p>
<p><strong>Best Achievement in Directing:<br />
</strong> My pick: <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000941/" target="_blank">Kathryn Bigelow</a> (<em>The Hurt Locker</em>)<br />
Winner: Kathryn Bigelow (<em>The Hurt Locker</em>)<br />
Underdog: <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000233/" target="_blank">Quentin Tarantino</a> (<em>Inglorious Basterds</em>)</p>
<p>She has the critics on her side, why bet on anyone else? <em>Avatar</em> was a total tech-gasm but purely on merit, James Cameron just doesn&#8217;t get close. He has no nuance or scope and hasn&#8217;t directed anything worth watching since 1991. Really, I just hope Tarantino pulls this one out, which would be very&#8230; uh&#8230; Tarantino? (Except for all the death.)</p>
<p><strong>Best Performance by an Actress, Supporting:<br />
</strong> My pick: <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0594898/" target="_blank">Mo&#8217;Nique</a> (<em><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0929632/" target="_blank">Precious</a></em>)<br />
Winner: Mo&#8217;Nique (<em>Precious</em>)<br />
Underdog: <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0447695/" target="_blank">Anna Kendrick</a> (<em>Up in the Air</em>)</p>
<p>Mo&#8217;Nique has this and has since the first day she strapped on a bandana and nom-nommed her first chicken wing. That said, Kendrick is a huge part of that obnoxious adorable mentioned earlier. A win here could break her free of the excrutiating hell that is the Twilight series. We here at the Chasm wish her luck.</p>
<p><strong>Best Performance by an Actor, Supporting:<br />
</strong> My pick: <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0910607/" target="_blank">Christoph Waltz</a> (<em>Inglorious Basterds</em>)<br />
Winner: <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000354/" target="_blank">Matt Damon</a> (<em><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1057500/" target="_blank">Invictus</a></em>)</p>
<p>HaHA! Okay, I&#8217;m just having fun here. Who the hell gives two shirts about that movie? Rugby? South Africa after <em><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0395169/" target="_blank">Hotel Rwanda</a></em>? Yawn.</p>
<p>When he puts that glass of milk to his lips&#8230; just so&#8230; #boom! Oscar. Had this been any other year, <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000437/" target="_blank">Woody Harrelson</a> would have easily taken the prize.</p>
<p><strong>Best Performance by an Actress, Leading:<br />
</strong> My pick: <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000113/" target="_blank">Sandra Bullock</a> (<em>The Blind Side</em>)<br />
Winner: Sandra Bullock (<em>The Blind Side</em>)</p>
<p>Dear readers, it hurts. The pain of putting Bullock&#8217;s name in &#8220;ink&#8221; is that of a thousand paper cuts. If the paper were on fire. But she&#8217;s the <em>only</em> one on this list. Meryl Streep is Meryl Streep and she did a great impression of Ms. Child, I guess. Just not enough to combat the feel-good, sassy-shorts Sandra who came at it with big-haired guns blaring.</p>
<p><strong>Best Performance by an Actor:<br />
</strong> My pick: <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000313/" target="_blank">Jeff Bridges</a> (<em><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1263670/" target="_blank">Crazy Heart</a></em>)<br />
Favorite: Jeff Bridges (<em>Crazy Heart</em>)<br />
Underdog: <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0719637/" target="_blank">Jeremy Renner</a> (<em>The Hurt Locker</em>)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000151/" target="_blank">Morgan Freeman</a>&#8216;s impression of Nelson Mendela is great and all, but, like Streep, he doesn&#8217;t have a chance. Renner, though, put in a haunted performance and could have won&#8230; if it weren&#8217;t for Bridges having this one in the bag. It appears those that vote are behind him 110%.</p>
<p><strong>Best Motion Picture:<br />
</strong> My pick: <em>The Hurt Locker</em><br />
Favorite: <em>Avatar</em><br />
Underdog: <em>Inglourious Basterds</em></p>
<p>I wish I could say <em>Hurt Locker</em>, the far better movie, takes home the statue. Unfortunately, bedazzled by the money and effects, <em>Avatar</em> will probably take it. Like <a href="http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/pedobear" target="_blank">Pedobear</a> would were he to have the chance.</p>
<p>Also, this blatant ploy to get a bigger audience involved is desperate and horrifying. <em>The Blind Side</em>? That wasn&#8217;t even the best <em>family </em>film of the year, much less the best overall. If movies weren&#8217;t already dead I&#8217;d say nominating ten movies for the Best Picture would kill them. (<a href="http://movie-critics.ew.com/2010/02/05/could-hurt-locker-change-the-oscars/" target="_blank">Here&#8217;s a great article</a> about how <em>Hurt Locker</em> winning could change things quite a bit.)</p>
<p><span class="tiny">Photo courtesy About.com</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thoughtchasm.com/2010/02/2010-oscar-predictions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
