Archive for September, 2009

a grammar lesson:

Wednesday, September 16th, 2009

TypeThere are many differences betwixt the UK and US. Many are good, like the US becoming obsessed with hygienic marketing and washing themselves often, including their teeth. Some are bad, like the UK having few domestic resources.

Others, the ones I pay attention to, are hilarious. Coffee vs Tea, when everyone knows they’re both terrible. Right- vs Left-side driving because all drivers are terrible, distracted and dangerous. Yards (only us) vs Meters (everyone else).

Or our “shared” language: Did you know “color” has a “u”? Or “gray” is “grey”? And then there’s punctuation within quotations. What a cluster that is, right?

For those who went to public school and/or are young enough to fail through No Child Left Behind, here’s a refresher, brought to you by Tina Blue:

[Regarding question marks or exclamation points:] If it is part of the quotation itself, we put it inside the quotation marks, and if it governs the sentence as a whole but not the material being quoted, we put it outside the quotation marks.*

Simple, right?, but what about periods and commas, you (don’t) ask?

Universal American usage places commas and periods inside the quotation marks, regardless of logic… [except] when that last little item enclosed in quotation marks is just a letter or a number, in which case the period or comma will go outside the closing quotation marks.

Notice the “Universal American” specified there? That’s because the UK doesn’t throw that bit of huh into things. Commas and periods are placed the same as our question marks and exclamation points.

She explains this became the standard because of typesetting errors. Then she says: “But apparently only American printers were more attached to convenience than logic, since British printers continued to risk the misalignment of their periods and commas.”**

This “convenience for logic” sacrifice may explain a great many things. However… we’re passionate, misinformed, uneducated and overfed so we think we can shop our way out of recession and oil is magically infinite. (More proof of latter statement, via DC.)

All and all, we have better teeth (stereotypically), so things are going quite well.

* For those that text: add the string of exclamation points (I knw, u r totes crzy, yo!!!) after the quotations unless you’re quoting someone else’s string of exclamation points (cuz OMG they’z stoked 2, yo!!), where they should go within the quotes. In either case you’re an idiot.

** You can take this grammar advice however you like because she used “since” instead of the correct, “because” (or similar) in this case. As you likely missed it, move along and try reading something heavier than the Twilight series. (It’ll be hard at first but sound out the big words, “thorough,” for instance, and you’ll be fine.)

Photo Courtesy: I Love Typography

VMA performances, rated

Tuesday, September 15th, 2009

Jay-Z at VMAsWhile I was watching the Packers barely edge out demolish the Bears on NBC.com it appears MTV was trying hard to be interesting. Having missed it and in a fit of boredom and curiosity, I objectively (haHa!) watched some performances from the VMAs and will now dazzle you with a brief, in-depth (intentional oxymoron) rundown, worst to best. (Click headings to watch.)

Remembering DJ AM

So… I don’t know much about the guy but he worked with famous people and (like so many other “geniuses”) dosed himself to un-breathing. The performance, in kind, featured more people and a song I don’t know (maybe a cover?) that appeared to be the manifestation of a hip-hop’s sigh.

Lady GaGa is psycho

Why do people like this “lady?” Is it the new face? the odd, trying-too-hard-to-be-interesting performances? the mind-numbing lyrics and over-produced, thumping “music?” (Maybe just the giant fire-cracker bra?)

What was I talking about? Oh…

“Her” performance had something to do with her shitty song about being too famous, or whatever. She’s dancing in front of millions (including almost 36% who think it’s a music show) in underwear while complaining that people won’t leave her alone? Thou protest too much…

Beyoncé does her video live, with clone stamp

If I’ve said it a dozen times I’ve said it seven, the Beyoncë thing confuses me. She’s a great singer, adequate dancer and the single most overrated “songwriter” of our age. Her contributions to female empowerment are:

  • dropping two members of her group, then two more, to keep focus on her
  • being proud of curves, then slimming considerably
  • encouraging women to drop ultimatums just after marrying a demigod.

But I digress. The performance is… her “Single Ladies” video… with those background dancers duplicated a few ten times. Oh, and stop the video often and unexpectedly. Outside of proving her hips gyrate and she can pull off a leotard, nothing to see.

Pink travels with the circus

I like Pink. She simultaneously accepts and rejects the pop model. The performance tied directly to her song, showed some daring and was different. Not death-defying or anything but just enough spectacle to be overshadowed by the Diva Beyoncè and her thighs.

Taylor Swift takes the train

No, I’m not saying the performance was better just because Kanye was a douchebag again. She deserved the award and he’s an asshole but the performance stood on its own. Why?

Because it’s adorable, to the point and somewhat elaborate. It embraces pop and has an elegance to it. Who needs fireworks and smoke and lasers when you have a pre-recorded bit and a cab? (Beyoncê?)

Speaking of lasers…

An epic tribute, through dancegasm

Maybe because it was MTV that made him and how big he became, but this was a solid tribute. The videos were well-chosen, the dancing was entertaining and it was conceptually spot-on. (Almost as good as this.)

Then Janet came out and rocked the dance-duet with his projected image over her left shoulder. Epic. He brought pop to another level and it’s been decaying ever since. (Also: The Gloved One was awesome.)

Brooklyn steals the show

Brilliant. No flash. Bare bones music, something MTV has been violently opposed to since the mid-90s. From the walk-out to Beyonc∑ with Lady GaGa wearing a bird’s nest behind her to the lady inexplicably injected into the final seconds of the performance (intentional?), it was all gold.

market health care != reality

Monday, September 14th, 2009

GovernatorBeing the only thing taught in public schools since the Red Scare, most of you probably know of and think highly of a “Free Market.” This blanket assumption has many, many flaws and worse, we’re trying to apply markets where they don’t fit.

Market assumptions are simple. Supply of a good is tracked against the demand for that good and where they intersect is the price. Ignoring for a moment this ignores cost, depletion or waste (as so many do) how does this apply to health care?

A market needs two things: something of value (sometimes tactile) and consumers with choice. Whenever a market is artificially added to a sector without these things, disaster (exploitation, Enron) ensues.

Health care is one of these sectors. Consumers (used generally to label the 98% not able to buy specialist care out of boredom) don’t have choice. They’re sitting across from their doctor and being told their options. If they need an MRI they don’t check the going rate in China or on NewEgg, for instance.

Insurance, medical practitioners, pharmaceuticals and many others are all under the blanket label of Health Care and it’s also something everyone needs. This not only depletes consumers’ choices further but confuses any market assumptions.

Applying a market to a natural monopoly (built, in this case, on high cost, low access and government assistance) never works. When the idea hit the electricity sector manipulation, artificial scarcity, high profits, unreliable supply and scandal were the natural results.

Health care in this country boils down to two things. On one side, you’re for single payer reform and believe health care is a right. On the other, you want to paint a market over a monopoly and see health care as a privilege (though few will admit that).

On whichever side you fall, take a look at Frontline‘s look at six democratic countries with state-backed health care. Ask yourself, why can’t we have a system like Taiwan? Or Switzerland? Or the best parts of both?

In both cases they’re trying to force a market into a sector it doesn’t belong but it’s working for the people, not the companies.

Photo courtesy: SFGate.com