Archive for February, 2009

kin

Wednesday, February 18th, 2009

One throbs with empathy. Her heart is heavier than her head, filled with thoughtful and caring. She feels more for strangers than I do for myself. She’s quick to trust, vulnerable where I’m shielded.

She prefers to understand before interjecting, letting conversation soak before responding. Dripping with self-doubt and she’s self-assured, intermittently, she’s fiery when put on the defensive.

Another pulses with social energy, witty and entertaining. She befriends easily, spritzed with shy. Able to discuss about anything with anyone, she is quick to ask and understand.

She’s less open, aporetic but devoted. Dressed in head-to-toe rational, she can deflect or manipulate those incensed or less deft.

A third vibrates with words, talking without saying. He’s skeptical, slow to trust, quick to condescend. He’s low on friendships but fiercely loyal. He’s judgmental and shallow, thinking too much.

Typically, he’s logical, trying to get as much information possible before reacting. Other times he reacts before realizing, with mixed results. His written or spoken words distract, clouding shaky points or thoughtless insights.

For too long they’ve been separate, finding themselves at their own pace. Together is different now, more interesting, less stressful. It’s far more enjoyable.

Three so different, yet similar. Linked through so many double helixes and shared environments. There’s no foretelling what’s to come but more time together is a necessity.

the times goes crazy (yawn)

Tuesday, February 17th, 2009

Friday, under their “First Look Blog” the folk over at The New York Times Online went nuts and introduced a new “article skimmer.” As far as I can tell, they took the layout and concept of AllTop and added a blurb with an image. (Original!)

There will probably be ads among the articles. How will that affect the clean feel of it or the usefulness? What about user-generated homepages based on predetermined areas of interest? (A homepage with the top articles from Sports, World and Arts, for example.)

Many already have RSS readers or dynamic bookmarks to access the content they want while avoiding the ads and nonsense that typically comes with. Now The New York Times can manage (read: inject ads into) their own “feed.” The idea is already nearing ubiquitous so it’s boring but I still like it.

With improvements, and with varying versions for different applications, this could be big step away from a print-oriented business model (Front page, See [page], top content). Considering newspapers have had to resort to putting ads on the front page and above the fold, it’s about time.

To their credit, The New York Times has consistently been ahead of the curve with online projects. They opened up their online archives awhile back when they disabled pay accounts and they’ve put their fingers into quite a few social media pots.

One can only hope that their being early-adopters will help. They’ll need to attract enough readers to compensate for their current, too-perishable audience that’s discontinuing subscriptions because they’re grandchildren have started emailing them photos.

Update from previous post: Some have said, in so many words, “who cares?” to the TOS change within Facebook. Understandable. My point was they’ve made another of many mistakes. Their failure to notify users, their post-wreckage band-aide post, their arrogant grab of content and their complete defiance of the data portability flag they’ve wrapped themselves in is what’s outrageous. Not them doing it in the first place.

From a company so melodramatically moronic, it should have been expected. Zuckerberg and Co. have essentially told us to chill out, that they won’t use our content how we wouldn’t want, and we should trust them. When someone asks me to trust them (especially after proving themselves untrustworthy), I don’t.

relationship: my money and facebook

Monday, February 16th, 2009

I wanted to title this, “why the stewards of data portability can’t be trusted” but nobody off my followers list would have read further.

I’m a binge/purge anti/pro-consumerist. I have two Facebook accounts. Both facts are perilously close to becoming problems. My lack of trust in others and knowing Facebook is a sham run by morons has me anxious.

I’ve slowed my financial flow. I’ve replaced much of my decayed savings in the last month or so and am attempting to be more frugal. (Somehow I’ve misplaced ≈$25 somewhere so I can’t claim I’m doing well.) Unfortunately, when it comes to personal data, I can’t do the same to protect my online persona.

Note for those with lives off the interweb:
There’s a set of folk who are flexing their keggels in wait for “data portability.” This basically means all your profile/personal data is open so it can be accessed from anywhere. (One profile, multiple sites. Fun, right?) Facebook Connect (with so much of this data) was the beacon of hope for the data-portables.

Without time to remove or edit current profiles, Facebook decided to change their Terms of Service so they have control of users’ data forever. (In my limited grasp of space-time continuums and Sci-Fi movies, that’s a long time.) Thus, they’ve proven they can’t be trusted. Again.

Facebook uses it’s ample user base within a corporate-control experiment in a desperate attempt to generate any revenue. Still, they’re a (or the) primary player and should be held to account. (Myspace, et al shouldn’t be trusted either.)

How Facebook could have better managed their manipulation (an incomplete list):

  • Announce the change (people could reduce the amount of information on their profile)
  • Provide the option to remove one’s data from pool (profile appears the same, data not sold)
  • Change as an opt-in under the guise of providing better service
  • Delete the data upon deletion of an account (their 150+ million users should provide sufficient data for sale).

These would have provided less data to start but would have let users grow comfortable with the idea.

One of the underlying goals of data portability is control, use of your data as you see fit. Facebook taking that control (essentially stealing your data indefinitely) is an affront to just that. For now, just like my dismal savings (and worse outlook), I can only omit (nights on the town = profile information).

Data portability could be a powerful tool for users and marketers alike (follow @alisamleo at Web is Social), but until we have control, it will remain a movement for cheerleaders on the fringe. Users’ common sense (read: fear) and corporate manipulation will continue to render it completely ineffective.

For those on Facebook or considering joining (who isn’t on it? I mean… really…), take note and watch what you’re putting into their systems. Your profile will outlive you.

Cross-posted at Sex Drugs and Intellectual Freedom.

Update: Some have said, in so many words, “who cares?” to the TOS change within Facebook. Understandable. My point was they’ve made another of many mistakes. Their failure to notify users, their post-wreckage band-aide post, their arrogant grab of content and their complete defiance of the data portability flag they’ve wrapped themselves in is what’s outrageous. Not them doing it in the first place.

From a company so melodramatically moronic, it should have been expected. Zuckerberg and Co. have essentially told us to chill out, that they won’t use our content how we wouldn’t want, and we should trust them. When someone asks me to trust them (especially after proving themselves untrustworthy), I don’t.

friday free for all

Friday, February 13th, 2009

… I was sick Saturday night through Tuesday night. I caught up on “Flight of the Conchords,” “Six Feet Under,” finished “This Land is Their Land” and watched a few movies. Calling that productive is like calling me handsome or universally liked. (In that it’s so obvious it causes nosebleeds, of course.)

… Wednesday, Girlfriend and I had a night out. With the trips and work and pulling my hair out (metaphorically) and all that, it’s been awhile. As it’s winter and Minneapolis can make a witch’s teet seem tropical, we went to a movie. (The Reader, more on that later.)

Kerasotes, awhile back, bought out the multi-screen downtown. They offer a Five Buck Club (free!) that sends you a card and then emails about upcoming shows you can get at that ridiculously low (high, for the “back in my day” folk) price. If you’re not part of the club, you’re dimmer than an compact-fluorescent after the Apocalypse, I guess, is what I’m saying.

… This weekend is Valentine’s Day. I try (and fail) to make Girlfriend feel as special as I think she is every day. Luckily, there’s a day when I can do that when everyone else is doing the same. (Individuality!)

Guys, make sure you do something worthy of her telling her friends about it. It’s all she thinks about (according to all the sexist ads out this week) between how many carats her dream ring is/which detergent to use/how fat she feels and how annoyed she is that you like sports/don’t vacuum/are a terrible father.

Singles, here’s your annual chance for some pity-play. Happy hunting!

taken

Thursday, February 12th, 2009
Taken

Taken

If the character, Jason Bourne, were retired, with a daughter, and starred in another movie based on the mutated sexing of The Transporter and Live Free or Die Hard (directed by the editor of Eyes Wide Shut ), it’d be called Taken. The action is gritty, the story is smart and the pace is unrelenting.

It follows Bryan Mills (Liam Neeson), who used to work (vaguely) “for the government.” He’s retired to try and be a bigger part of his seventeen-year-old daughter’s (Maggie Grace) life. She, and her mother (Famke Janssen), convince him to allow her to visit Paris under less-than-true pretenses. The shit, as they say, hits the fan.

It’s an action movie. Generally, this means the premise, outcomes and character’s access to precise knowledge are absurd. (This holds true.) But, the acting is superior to your average and the basic premise is too broad not to at least dip your toes in.

It’s as entertaining as it is unrealistic and as awesome as it is… well… awesome. (Read: not getting paid for this.) Neeson is badass. Watch it if you’re in the mood for some blowing up, mixed-martial-arts maiming.

Need more? How’s this for a plot driving quote?

If you are looking for ransom, I can tell you I don’t have money. But what I do have are a very particular set of skills; skills I have acquired over a very long career. Skills that make me a nightmare for people like you. If you let my daughter go now, that’ll be the end of it. I will not look for you, I will not pursue you. But if you don’t, I will look for you, I will find you, and I will kill you.

Answer: Unreal.

triskaidekaphobic

Wednesday, February 11th, 2009

The granite shivers, laughing as I near the doors, mocking me. The windows smirk, knowing I’d rather be anywhere but behind them. The door welcomes sarcastically, ready to embrace me despite my discomfort.

The elevator quivers, snickering as the light from each floor, barely visible in the slit between its doors, warns of my getting closer. The button shines brightly, almost pulsating, then suddenly, it expires. With an “ugh,” the elevator falls to a stop. The doors ease open.

I walk slowly to the door, sigh and pull out my wallet. I hold it up to the tiny red light, hear the click of the door, twist the handle and pull it open. The hall screams at me, begging me not to enter.

I turn the corner, following the row of cubicles instead of the bleak off-white hall. There’s only the quiet buzz of the ducts above, no hint of the coming commotion. The blinds are drawn, blocking some cold air but mostly the light, the view, the outside.

The desk wraps around the cube, terminating at a metal shelving unit. It’s attached to the cubicle walls, jutting out just far enough for me to curl into the fetal position beneath it, hidden from direct view. The “walls” themselves are wrapped in red or beige felt, topped with a one-foot by three-feet piece of fogged glass.

The fabric saps my energy, slowly, satiating itself on tiny morsels instead of engorging itself, leaving me shriveled and comatose. The decorations are sparse, only covering a small portion of the woven, metal-framed, not-quite-to-ceiling prison.

I roll the exercise ball that replaced my chair awhile back in front of the computer, popping it open. The day has begun.

From here, the office fills with coworkers. They mill about, contributing to a dull white noise, typing, dialing, talking and shuffling. Announcements ring over the PA, twice for redundancy. Questions, answers, questions, meetings, meetings about meetings.

The day drags, slowly loping by like a freakish beast written of in books or on cave walls. The weight of it suffocating and indifferent. Project after project, indecision after argument, YouTube clip after Tweet. Eight hours, maybe more, of monotony.

The digital displays, never synchronized, eventually mark the end. There are no chimes, no trumpets, just a dull realization.

I close the laptop, tear myself from the cubicle and stride down the hall. I twist the door handle, ignore the mild static shock and step out, quickly, to the elevators. My heart moans in pleasure at the faint click of the door closing behind me.

The elevator descends, arduously, releasing me thirteen levels below. Immediately I’m on the street, walking slowly, running for my life. Trying to forget I’ll face the laughs, smirks and jeers of my tormentors again. Tomorrow.