Archive for December, 2007

oops, I did it again

Wednesday, December 19th, 2007

And by “it,” I mean another Spears pregnancy. I couldn’t resist; the title’s catchy. Take that, abstinence-only education!

That’s right, you heard it here last folks, the younger Spears is all kinds of knocked up. Ok, class, who saw this coming? All of you? Congratulations, you’re not as dumb as you look even Stanley, the one that just ain’t right. This is probably the richest pack of W.T. I think has ever been recorded.

They’ve got the accents, the stage mom, the track-suit wedding, the bastard children and the thug baby’s daddy. I sincerely believe that Britney keeps driving into shit because W.T. are not meant to own vehicles that aren’t immobile on blocks. Britney herself is already through with her second marriage and, if forced into a factory job, would fail a half-dozen drug tests before taking her first piss of the day. She dresses like her stylist is a thirty-dollar whore from the slums of Memphis who has “the crabs” and because of an impressive lack of education believes they come from wearing undergarments.

This is why, as a population, we are getting dumber by the generation. The dumb ones rock out genetic clones much earlier and more frequently than the I-need-to-wait-’til-I-can-afford-it-and-my-job-allows folk. The Spears hit the jackpot by having a cute daughter that struck richness before the ignorance see: track marks started to show. Now they can pack their intellectually-challenged spawn into mansions instead of a rented double-wide.

The young one was ’sposed to be the good one. She was brought up in the flash bulbs while dodging the stigma that comes with a sexually hyperactive older sister. Turns out she was taking it ha in stride while trying to make her own slutty mark on this world. I wouldn’t normally call her a slut I’m all about sexual freedom for the pre-adult crowd, but it’s obvious she comes from low-end seed and she admitted wanting to “keep [her] options open.” Thank goodness she’s too young to go through the expense of a hasty marriage where she’d have to spend a few months at least; otherwise the marriage ain’t right in the eyes of God, and so on with some guy she doesn’t like attached to a dick she does.

I don’t know if you caught it, but the hands-down best part of this whole thing is her reason for raising the soon-to-be W.T. in Louisiana. “So it can have a normal family life.” Because every Louisiana native deserves the right to play with his or her bastard cousins under the supervision of heavily-funded nannies and hulking, paparazzi-deterring bodyguards while their mothers go out on the town snorting who-knows-what powders off no-names’ asses with their grandma. Seems her “normal” life is paying off in spades.

God didn’t bless the U.S. sorry G. Dubb. He’s using us as an experiment to see how fast a culture can destroy itself without Biblical plagues. I imagine they, even for He who created Heaven and Earth, can be taxing. I can’t speak for how the experiment is going smart and inhumanly handsome I may be, but Godly I am not, but all signs point to putting raining frogs and rivers of blood into the “beating a dead horse” category.

velour

Wednesday, December 19th, 2007

Eeerup… Eeerup… Eeerup…

Fuck! It is so damn cold. After two and a half weeks of work, I’m still not used to getting up this early. For the last four years I’d rarely rose before eight. This was the second day in a row. Still almost dark.

The uniform is black, so my shirt goes on inside out—barely noticeable in my state of quasi-awareness. All I know is that I’m in no shape to face the day. My body is sore and all my muscles flex with the cold, rusty, ache of an ancient barn door. I hope it’s an easy move today.

Traffic’s not bad. Probably because it’s too early for the heavy rush. The nine-to-fivers are almost an hour behind me. Driving to their temperature-controlled offices and their mindless, tedious tasks.

Two moves today. First time that’s happened. I guess it’s about time. All the guys warn me about summer and how busy it’ll become. Moving with Johnson though and he’s a douchebag.

The load goes well. I guess I was doing alright. No complaints were heard from the customer and James was making some pretty decent conversation. I’m moving their television on the unload when I get the sense that shit is about to hit the fan. I can’t tell if my hands are still gripping the television’s bottom, but I feel it slipping down my forearm. “Hey Johnson. Hold up a second. I need to take a break and put this thing down. My hands are killing me and I’m losing grip.”

“Just keep going. We’re almost in the house…” He starts, before I lean down and put my end down. Fuck him. My right forearm is threatening to tense and tighten until I grip my own wrist.

“Do you need any help?” Comes the customer’s brother.
“No. I just need a quick break ’cause it’s slipping…”
“Well, I can grab it if you need…”
“I should be able to get it. I don’t know if you need to help…”
“It’s no problem. I helped get the boxes over here the other day. Let me grab some shoes.” He darts up the stairs enthusiastically.
“Yah, sure… I’ll be…” I trailed off on my way to the truck to stretch my forearm and grab something small while Johnson and Brother place the TV.

Three seconds later there is a shrill yelp, followed by a satisfying thud. I should be more concerned.

On the obligatory walk toward the noise I put on my most sympathetic face. “What happened?” I ask, as if I didn’t know the jackass had just dropped it, misjudging the weight. He is nursing his right foot. Johnson is still holding the television up with the other end resting on the fourth stair. I stifle a reflex-laugh.

Oh shit. The customer’s wife is coming down the stairs—dressed to the nine in a velour jumpsuit. As we set the TV in its place on the stand, she starts to huff. I can almost hear the ridiculous bitching being sorted and refined behind those dull eyes. Those eyes are fixed on the jagged plastic edge of the missing right corner. Her face starts to flush a strange shade of violet. Maybe the brown of the velour creates that hue. “You’re going to pay for that right?” She says, remarkably calm.

“Well I’m sure we can work something out.” I reply on my way out the door. We still have smaller furniture to get in and the second move. I wasn’t about to listen to the box go off on me for a half-inch worth of plastic her brother-in-law broke.

The rest of the truck went quickly, but I continued to hear mutterings from Wife. As we finished, Customer started to feel the pressure that only a married man knows. He wanted to talk to the office. He wanted to strike a deal. He was weak-willed and pathetic. He was paying me to move his shit. I didn’t say anything.

“Don’t worry about it,” James consoled, in a way. “She’s just a bitch and wants something extra.”
“I know. I didn’t even move the piece. I just needed a break before the second set of stairs. The brother-in-law’s the one that fucked up, but he’s not going to pay so they have to come after us.” Why do I talk like an uneducated factory drone around this guy?
“The office will handle it.”

—–

We’re the first ones back. I guess that’s not surprising, we were the only truck that left. Within thirty seconds of walking in the back door and through the warehouse, I was explaining my side of things to Gregg.

The customer was claiming I couldn’t lift the TV and that I spent fifteen minutes in the truck. As these were both lies, I think I’m justified in wanting to take Wife’s head by the tussled blonde ponytail and left-foot it through imaginary uprights from fifty yards. The visual resulted in an immediate smirk. Maybe I’m just an asshole.

When I get rich, I’ll be one of the nice ones. One of those people everyone wants to spend time with. I’ll be a great and generous person. People will envy me. I’ll marry a sexy piece of ass who enjoys philosophy and finances her own binge shopping. I’m lying to myself. It suppresses the rage building at the back of my shoulders and base of my skull. I fantasize of my future wife’s sweet ass while stuck in traffic on the drive home. I hate traffic.

thoughts on food: popcorn

Tuesday, December 18th, 2007

I’ve mentioned the oddity that is candy corn. Corn itself, the kerneled bits of yellow possible-ethanol, disgusts me but it’s easy to swallow like so many pills, so it was one of my favorites growing up. Popcorn is a whole ’nother animal. I don’t really understand the stuff, but have little interest in how it’s made, why it pops, or any such things. What concerns me, is why I insist on eating it.

There’s a lot going against it. The sharp, dangerously thin bits of kernel that are left after whatever it is inside explodes into white, starchy, tastelessness always get stuck in my teeth. I don’t particularly like nutrition-free edibles doused generously in salt. Butter and I have a strained relationship premature heart disease is almost penciled on my google calendar, but the ick-based substance that takes the place of butter on mass-produced popcorn can go straight to hell.

There are two types I enjoy stuffing into my maw: cheesy and kennel. I’ve been known especially recently to dabble with the caramel. Kennel has a little sweetness to it, and even a rich flavor if it’s done right. Cheesy is… well. Cheesy. The odd crevices that are created through the heat-induced burst are ideal for holding the powdered near-cheese.

I don’t know why I said “enjoy” just then. I don’t go out of my way to eat the stuff. I even pass on it when it’s within reach on most occasions. I gulp down the free offerings at Sally’s because I’m usually waiting impatiently for a discount burger or trying to hold of inebriation. But yesterday and today I painfully worked my way through bowls of the stuff. I regret it, but it happened, so what am I to do?

I haven’t brought lunch trying to save the bread for after I return from the holiday festivities; don’t want that $1.25 loaf to go stale on me and don’t feel like spending money because I’ve done enough of that this month to be sure; fucking consumerists so I’m left scavenging. I ate two bowls of caramel corn yesterday and took no joy from it. At 9.15a today I was already digesting half a bowl of cheesy corn. It’s a sad state of affairs. On the brighter side, tomorrow and Thursday this guy’s being treated to midday grub.

As a reward for making it this far in such an absurdly lame it’s the holiday season, what can I say? I’ve checked out; post, here’s how to destroy society as told and illustrated by Scott Meyer and a commentary on clowns from C-dog over at zombie fights shark. Enjoy.

tolerate

Tuesday, December 18th, 2007

“No society has ever gotten more tolerant. They just change targets.”

Is that a call for more tolerance? It seems defeatist, but realistic. Tolerance doesn’t exist. Tolerance is only the lack of motivation to act on prejudices or the fear of backlash. Acceptance should be the goal of any society, but we’ve never had that. We “tolerate” other races because most of us, the white folk, in a Christian country, the most powerful on earth, don’t see the point in throwing hate speech at the minorities.

We don’t hate black people. It’s impolite. We economically exclude them from the better parts of our cities and send the lowest paid, least motivated teachers to their schools. Educated black men and women are still seen as the exception. We don’t hate the American Indian. They’re mentioned in passing as alcoholics and greedy casino owners, but why toss hate speech at them when we’ve already destroyed their culture and stolen their lands? It seems rude. Asians Americans aren’t seen through contemptuous eyes because China is still too small a global player and the Japanese were herded into camps only sixty years ago. It’s too soon.

Mexicans and various other races are no threat to us or have similar enough cultures to the point we don’t notice a difference. We live together without, generally, major issues. The isolated noose hanging in trees is passed off as a prank and slurs are dismissed. Racism has been reduced to economic ceilings, residential zoning and educational rifts for these cultures. In this great melting pot nation of ours, we have a new target.

That quote comes from a transcript of Glenn Beck’s program. It is one of hundreds of examples of how our country’s racism now points to the Muslim population. More precisely, the minuscule fraction of their population that is “radical Islam.” We don’t attack the population as a whole, but their extremists, because we avoid being racist. What we say and what we mean are two different things. Christians are not separated into factions. Whether extreme or progressive, he or she is a Christian. We speak of a Muslim division, but they’re still seen as a united, opposing front. The linguistic gymnastics have little effect on the intended meaning.

The commentary within that transcript defends the advertising of an anti-Muslim film as free speech. The “truth” of radical Islam’s quest to kill us—meaning the American, white people—is affirmed numerous times. The host and guest have no doubt in this fact. They don’t take time to acknowledge the opposite perspective. If that poster, or that advertising, or that film, were trumpeting the “truism” that republican extremists meant to kill liberals or if it, shown at conservative Princeton, called for the killing of Republican party members, it would immediately be labeled hate speech. There would be dozens of uproarious calls for removing the film and its advertising.

It’s not attacking the Republicans, the Christians or the conservatives. It’s attacking a demonized and poorly-understood sect, Muslims, so advertising can be as intense and grotesque as deemed persuasive. It furthers the divide between cultures. It segregates a community. It is derogatory and mean-spirited while ignoring the views or opinions of those mentioned. Thus, any backlash to it’s promotion is an obvious attack on free speech. When a homosexual group complains about a slanderous or derogatory remark in the media, the same argument is generated. Why is it that a host can, rightly, be suspended for a racial comment, but those opposing a racist, unrealistic, generalized advertisement are immediately trying to strip us of our rights?

Those that call for open dialog here, don’t intend to have one. They crave their minority, extremist views be heard. They feel that, though most of the thoughtful population disagrees with them and finds their beliefs distasteful, they are being smothered. They use ridiculous examples of how campuses are being controlled, as if they haven’t been for centuries. The “don’t tase me, bro” guy and an incident with Alberto Gonzales are referenced.

The tased guy was disruptive and disrespectful. He resisted the calm attempts to quiet him. He was shutting down the open forum and preaching his views. When he was, finally, taken by force out of the room, he resisted again. He fought with the guards and they were forced to subdue him. His video was posted and now he sells t-shirts emblazoned with his infamous catch-phrase. He should have been maced, clubbed, and dragged out. Then those in charge should have announced the reopened discussion to boisterous applause.

Alberto Ganzales is a war criminal and an enemy of the state. His ambiguous definitions of torture and reinterpretation of clear laws are in direct defiance of what this country stands for. He has opened the doors to a fascist shift that may or may not take place. The incident at the University of Florida could have been troublesome, but if he wasn’t assassinated, he wasn’t adequately punished.

Every generation has had their ambiguous, inflated enemies. The Greeks had the Persians, the Romans had the Barbarians, and the American colonists had the Indians. F.D.R. had the Japanese, Johnson had the Vietnamese, Reagan had the Russians and now Bush has the Islamists. If we continue this polarized and inflammatory dialog, the rest of the world will have the Americans.

tolerate

Tuesday, December 18th, 2007

“No society has ever gotten more tolerant. They just change targets.”

Is that a call for more tolerance? It seems defeatist, but realistic. Tolerance doesn’t exist. Tolerance is only the lack of motivation to act on prejudices or the fear of backlash. Acceptance should be the goal of any society, but we’ve never had that. We “tolerate” other races because most of us, the white folk, in a Christian country, the most powerful on earth, don’t see the point in throwing hate speech at the minorities.

We don’t hate black people. (It’s impolite.) We economically exclude them from the better parts of our cities and send the lowest paid, least motivated teachers to their schools. Educated black men and women are still seen as the exception. We don’t hate the American Indian. They’re mentioned in passing as alcoholics and greedy casino owners, but why toss hate speech at them when we’ve already destroyed their culture and stolen their lands? It seems rude. Asians Americans aren’t seen through contemptuous eyes because China is still too small a global player and the Japanese were herded into camps only sixty years ago. (It’s too soon.)

Mexicans (the ones in Mexico at least) and various other races are no threat to us or have similar enough cultures to the point we don’t notice a difference. We live together without, generally, major issues. The isolated noose hanging in trees is passed off as a prank and slurs are dismissed. Racism has been reduced to economic ceilings, residential zoning and educational rifts for these cultures. In this great melting pot nation of ours, we have a new target.

That quote comes from a transcript of Glenn Beck’s program (brought to my attention by me dad, who asked my thoughts… he probably should have been more specific). It is one of hundreds of examples of how our country’s racism now points to the Muslim population. More precisely, the miniscule fraction of their population that is “radical Islam.” We don’t attack the population as a whole, but their extremists, because we avoid being racist. What we say and what we mean are two different things. Christians are not separated into factions. Whether extreme or progressive, he or she is a Christian. We speak of a Muslim division, but they’re still seen as a united, opposing front. The linguistic gymnastics have little effect on the intended meaning.

The commentary within that transcript defends the advertising of an anti-Muslim film as free speech. The “truth” of radical Islam’s quest to kill us—meaning the American, white people—is affirmed numerous times. The host and guest have no doubt in this fact. They don’t take time to acknowledge the opposite perspective. If that poster, or that advertising, or that film, were trumpeting the “truism” that republican extremists meant to kill liberals or if it, shown at conservative Princeton, called for the killing of Republican party members, it would immediately be labeled hate speech. There would be dozens of uproarious calls for removing the film and its advertising.

It’s not attacking the Republicans, the Christians or the conservatives (as if there’s any reason to attack them). It’s attacking a demonized and poorly-understood sect of the Muslim religion, so advertising can be as intense and grotesque as deemed persuasive (should have shown an image of Bin Laden machine-gunning Santa Claus; twould have been seasonal). It furthers the divide between cultures. It segregates a community. It is derogatory and ignores the views or opinions of those mentioned. Thus, any backlash to it’s promotion is an obvious attack on free speech (duh). When a homosexual group complains about a slanderous or derogatory remark in the media, the same argument is generated. Why is it that those opposing a racist, unrealistic, generalized advertisement are immediately trying to strip us of our rights?

Those that call for open dialog here, don’t intend to have one. They crave their minority, extremist views be heard. They feel that, though most of the thoughtful population disagrees with them and finds their beliefs distasteful, they are being smothered. They use ridiculous examples of how campuses are being controlled, as if they haven’t been for centuries. The “don’t tase me, bro” guy and an incident with Alberto Gonzales are referenced.

The tased guy was disruptive and disrespectful. He resisted the calm attempts to quiet him. He was shutting down the open forum and preaching his views. When he was, finally, taken by force out of the room, he resisted again. He fought with the guards and they were forced to subdue him. His video was posted and now he sells t-shirts emblazoned with his infamous catch-phrase. He should have been maced, clubbed, and dragged out. Then those in charge should have announced the reopened discussion to boisterous applause.

Alberto Ganzales is a war criminal and an enemy of the state. His ambiguous definitions of torture and reinterpretation of clear laws are in direct defiance of what this country stands for. He has opened the doors to a fascist shift that may or may not take place. The incident at the University of Florida could have been troublesome, but if he wasn’t assassinated, he wasn’t adequately punished.

Every generation has had their ambiguous, inflated enemies. The Greeks had the Persians, the Romans had the Barbarians, and the American colonists had the Indians. F.D.R. had the Japanese, Johnson had the Vietnamese, Reagan had the Russians and now Bush has the Islamists. If we continue this polarized and inflammatory dialog, the rest of the world will have the Americans.

Note: This is a bit out of place. I’ll get back to the posts about lame ads soon enough. Oh, and this is written completely in jest. Fuck the Muslims, they’re just jealous they don’t have Christmas… Right Bill? And Bill-O, if you’re reading this, I totally, like, love the O’Reilly factor. It’s the only place I can go with the right racist spin to make myself feel better about being afraid all the time. I can’t wait for my kids to read your book. If I teach them to read, that is, what with all that liberal bias in the written word nowadays.

Second note: That last bit, after the ‘lame ads part,’ was a joke. In case you were wondering.

juno

Monday, December 17th, 2007

Have you caught all the hype? Juno’s the best comedy of the year. Juno should take home the best picture. Juno blows Knocked up and Superbad out of the water. Juno is God and we are all but worshipers to its celluloid throne. Then don’t see this one. At least not until you can get past all that. Like Little miss sunshine before it, it may not hold up to the detail-oriented eyes of those with high expectations. You’d be doing yourself a disservice.

Diablo Cody is taking over Hollywood like the U.S. took Hawaii. At least that’s what all the lip-service implies. She’s busy and in high demand, yes; she’s a quick witted persona that screams for media coverage and flash bulbs, yes; she’s the second coming of brilliance and the new face of Hollywood writers; a little too early to tell. To say her writing is original is an understatement, but it’s just too soon to put her next to the likes of Tarantino.

So take it easy, relax, inhale, exhale, cough (it is that time of season after all) and try to be uninfluenced as the trumpets blare through the Fox Searchlight opening sequence. Here’s my take on it:

The story is original, witty, poignant, and hilarious. The topic is not an easy one. Take the easy road and make a sentimental mess and you’re selling it off to the lifetime network at a bargain price. Go too far with the cutting humor and you’re audience will remain too distanced to take any part of it. Diablo and the actors that portrayed her unique characters, play it perfectly as far as I’m concerned. The wit plays alongside the emotional almost enthusiastically. The dialog is brilliant and the acting is great.

Ellen Page (hard candy, or for those who unfortunately missed that, X-men: last stand) seems to deliver her lines effortlessly and with realism that doesn’t fit her sixteen-year-old character. Like Dawson’s Creek uses multi-syllable verbiage far beyond their characters’ ages, this one is filled with references, sarcasm, and humor that is far too advanced for the characters’ years. But, you don’t notice because Page draws you in past the skepticism.

The rest of the cast is top-notch. Bateman (Smokin’ Aces, Dodgeball) is always hilarious. Cera (Superbad) plays dweeb like Clooney plays egoist, it’s just too natural. Garner (electra) doesn’t suck as much as she usually does, but she gave off this creepy vibe for the first part of her on-screen minutes that is hard to explain. Juno’s parents are hysterical, played by J.K. Simmons (Spidermans) and Allison Janney (chumscrubber, drop dead gorgeous).

I liked the direction because it was almost playful. The opening sequence was sweet. Some shots almost had heart to them. The last one, and you’ll know what I’m talking about after you’ve seen it, is a pretty damn good way to end a film such as this. It’s a great visualization of what I can imagine was an interesting piece of screen play.

This is the most original set of characters I’ve had the pleasure of viewing in a long time. They are simultaneously extraordinary and believable. That’s hard to pull off. The clerk at the drug store does talk a bit too much like the high schoolers, but his character’s voice is still separate and his lines are so over-the-top that it’s not all that distracting. The cast does a stellar job of providing the realism that knocked up lacked. The writing has more of an edge, and is generally smarter than, superbad and the characters are just as likable.

If Judd Apatow had produced this one, he would have transmutated into pure energy and the massive embassy in Iraq would have exploded in a fireball of love. The middle east would have peace and there would be no poverty in the U.s. because one man would have brought us more combined love than any single event outside of Grenouille’s odor in perfume. At least we avoided that.

*****